You are here:  Home Blog
AE Tuition Blog
Should 50 per cent of Young People go to University?
Written by Stephen Curran   
Thursday, 31 December 2009 11:44
(7 votes)

The simple answer to this question is no! University should be for those pursuing an academic education. In my experience as a teacher there are about 25% of students who have this level of ability. This will not change, so the only way to send more to university is to lower the standard of degrees. This is a disastrous policy and will devalue education in Britain. It also sends out the wrong signal regarding vocational forms of education. It makes those who follow this path feel they are not in the 50% who can gain a degree. The country is desperately short of people with technical skills and vocational skills and we are sending people who are not suitable for academic training to university. This is ridiculous! It has also led to high levels of student debt, which is completely unnecessary.

Many top companies take little notice of degrees, but test those applying to them by using psychometric exams. In the end ‘the truth will out’. It does not matter what degrees people have if there are no jobs for them. It will also create false expectations in many who have gained less demanding degrees. They will think they can work in media and high level occupations that require outstanding academic and thinking skills. This will lead to disenchantment and unhappiness in many students as they realise the job market will be more truthful about what they can and cannot do.

Add a comment
 
Have Exams Got Easier?
Written by Stephen Curran   
Tuesday, 22 December 2009 20:28
(5 votes)

If results are improving every year there are only four possible explanations for this: students have become more intelligent; students are working harder; teaching has significantly improved or, the most logical explanation – exams have become easier.

To be quite honest, most people will not believe a government that constantly announces improvements in educational results. I have been teaching over twenty years and I know such dramatic changes are not possible.

What has contributed to the improvements: increases in coursework components (the opportunity for cheating and getting help is enormous); modularity in syllabuses (testing students on each section just after they have done it); manipulation of marks (marks required to pass at each of the seven grades A to G have been steadily lowered – examiners complain about this); style of questions (children are led through sections of papers with stimulus material); changes in the marking system (at one time, only a certain percentage could achieve an A, B etc. regardless of the marking).

It is a national disgrace to lower standards. We should genuinely try to improve children’s performance, encourage them to work harder and improve teaching standards and not manipulate the results so as to pretend this has happened.

Add a comment
 
A Grammar School in Every Town
Written by Stephen Curran   
Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:46
(7 votes)
Queen Elizabeth Boys School, a school with a 300 hundred year history, reverted to being a selective grammar school under John Major’s government in 1994. It is now one of the top performing schools in the country. Both John Major and Michael Howard, the last two leaders of the Conservative Party believed they should place a grammar school in every town. This was a very popular policy as it would have given real opportunities to children from poorer backgrounds to go to a grammar school.

The fact there are so few grammar schools (164) has meant they are highly sought after by parents and this has made it harder to gain entry into them. David Cameron’s lack of direct support for grammar schools received a huge backlash in the press a couple of years ago. Surely he must realise his support for academies instead of grammar schools is a political mistake. Children from all backgrounds should have the opportunity for an academic education and they should be able to compete for the chance to have it. Academic excellence is not something to be ashamed of and we need to create routes for all children, from whatever class or background, to have this opportunity.

Add a comment
 
The Future of St. Bernard's Catholic Grammar
Written by Stephen Curran   
Friday, 18 December 2009 19:28
(6 votes)
There is a new attack on grammar schools that many are unaware of – starving them of cash. St. Bernard’s Catholic Grammar could be forced to become an academy by joining with St. Joseph’s Catholic Comprehensive. Strangely enough there is no money to repair or renovate the schools unless they become a super academy. So St. Bernard’s has to lose its selective status to be granted money by the government. This is a form of blackmail by this Labour Government. Hopefully a new Conservative government will sweep this form of educational vandalism aside.

Who wants this to happen? Quite frankly – hardly anybody, except the government (which has the money, which it will of course borrow) and the Northamptonshire Diocese (which has no money to help). Those who oppose the change include: virtually all the parents, the children, the teachers, the governors and prospective parents wishing to send their children to the school. In terms of results, this is the highest ranked school in Slough, beating all the other grammars in the area and the comprehensives (including academies).

Currently, there are only two Catholic grammar schools in the London area. However, St. Michael’s Catholic Grammar School in North London is a girls’ school. Therefore, St. Bernard’s is the only co-educational Catholic grammar and, if it changes to an academy, this will give parents less choice.

Add a comment
 
Grammar Schools and the Democratic Ideal
Written by Stephen Curran   
Monday, 14 December 2009 00:37
(6 votes)

It's very interesting to find that governments that only enjoy a minority of the country’s support also seem to pursue policies that are only supported by a minority of the public. It is clear from opinion polls a majority of people support the grammar school system but governments consistently fail to implement what the public really want. Northern Ireland has gone in the same direction. Opinion polls there clearly indicated that there was widespread opposition to abolition of selection. Again the Northern Ireland Assembly failed to listen to the people. Here is the evidence from reliable opinion polls.

Times Educational Supplement

An opinion poll carried out by FDS International for the Times Educational Supplement (7th January) found that 55 per cent of parents in social classes A and B supported a return to selection. This opinion was shared by 53 per cent of skilled workers. Support for selection dropped among so-called 'working class' parents, but even in this category, 42 per cent supported selection by ability at 11. (Please note, this is not just the retention of selection, but 'a return to selection'.)                                (The Daily Telegraph, 8 January 2000.)

It is no wonder that the general public become cynical about politics when the majority view is consistently ignored. Governments seem to think that when they are elected they can simply ignore the public until they face another election. And even then, they still take no notice of the public on many issues. The Conservative Party, the traditional friend of grammar schools, has ignored the statistics about grammar school support as we approach this election. What a tragedy for democracy!

Add a comment
 
More Articles...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>

Page 6 of 7